Quispe Quezada, Uriel RigobertoQuispe Quezada, Luthgardo P.Révolo Acevedo, Ronald H.Solano Velarde, ZosimoÁlvarez Orellana, JulioJauregui Ofracio, JanetteQuispe Reymundo, Bimael J.2026-04-222026-04-222023-12-20Quispe-Quezada, U. R. et al., (2023). Agricultural eco-efficiency and water footprint-A case study of fifteen crops in the Chupaca province of Peru Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 15(4), 1627 -1635. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v15i4.4410https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v15i4.4410https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14388/166The water footprint is an indicator of the impact of water use from its formation to its final destination. Agricultural eco-efficiency measures the efficient use of resources or materials available for crop production. Water's economic productivity analyses a product's efficient value as per its water supply and commercial value. The present research aimed to determine and relate the water footprint, economic productivity of water and agricultural eco-efficiency of 15 crops in the province of Chupaca - Peru. Georeferencing material was used for the delimitation of agricultural species, CROPWAT 8.0, CLIMWAT8.0, ArcGis 10.5 software, mathematical equations for the water footprint, agricultural eco-efficiency (Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)) and economic productivity of water. The Total water footprint (TWF) of the fifteen crops was 1718237.01 m3/ton, likewise the BlueWF > GreenWF > GreyWF. In their economic outputs, gross value of production (GVP) > agricultural production (Ag-p) > economic rent agricultural (ERA) was verified. In environmental costs, water consumption that meets the needs of crops (Wc-Ag) > consumption of phytosanitary products (C-fly) > fertilizer consumption (C-fe) was determined. The average Agricultural eco-efficiency (Ag-Eec) and Economic water productivity (Ewp) were 89.8% and 0.046 PEN/m3 respectively. Statistical analysis between Ewp and Ag-Eec was rho = 0.18, t-test = 0.66 < 2.16 (α = 0.05; bilateral), and the correlation indicated that both activities are independent. The environmental costs and economic outputs of agricultural eco-efficiency did not influence the economic value of water.enghttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Economic outputsEconomic value of waterEnvironmental costsWater footprinthttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.00.00Agricultural eco-efficiency and water footprint- A case study of fifteen crops in the Chupaca province of Peruhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1