Agricultural eco-efficiency and water footprint- A case study of fifteen crops in the Chupaca province of Peru

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorQuispe Quezada, Uriel Rigoberto
dc.contributor.authorQuispe Quezada, Luthgardo P.
dc.contributor.authorRévolo Acevedo, Ronald H.
dc.contributor.authorSolano Velarde, Zosimo
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Orellana, Julio
dc.contributor.authorJauregui Ofracio, Janette
dc.contributor.authorQuispe Reymundo, Bimael J.
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-22T22:30:19Z
dc.date.available2026-04-22T22:30:19Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-20
dc.description.abstractThe water footprint is an indicator of the impact of water use from its formation to its final destination. Agricultural eco-efficiency measures the efficient use of resources or materials available for crop production. Water's economic productivity analyses a product's efficient value as per its water supply and commercial value. The present research aimed to determine and relate the water footprint, economic productivity of water and agricultural eco-efficiency of 15 crops in the province of Chupaca - Peru. Georeferencing material was used for the delimitation of agricultural species, CROPWAT 8.0, CLIMWAT8.0, ArcGis 10.5 software, mathematical equations for the water footprint, agricultural eco-efficiency (Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)) and economic productivity of water. The Total water footprint (TWF) of the fifteen crops was 1718237.01 m3/ton, likewise the BlueWF > GreenWF > GreyWF. In their economic outputs, gross value of production (GVP) > agricultural production (Ag-p) > economic rent agricultural (ERA) was verified. In environmental costs, water consumption that meets the needs of crops (Wc-Ag) > consumption of phytosanitary products (C-fly) > fertilizer consumption (C-fe) was determined. The average Agricultural eco-efficiency (Ag-Eec) and Economic water productivity (Ewp) were 89.8% and 0.046 PEN/m3 respectively. Statistical analysis between Ewp and Ag-Eec was rho = 0.18, t-test = 0.66 < 2.16 (α = 0.05; bilateral), and the correlation indicated that both activities are independent. The environmental costs and economic outputs of agricultural eco-efficiency did not influence the economic value of water.
dc.identifier.citationQuispe-Quezada, U. R. et al., (2023). Agricultural eco-efficiency and water footprint-A case study of fifteen crops in the Chupaca province of Peru Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 15(4), 1627 -1635. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v15i4.4410
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v15i4.4410
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14388/166
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherANSF. Applied Natural Science Fundation
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceANSF. Vol 15 No 4 (2023)
dc.subjectEconomic outputs
dc.subjectEconomic value of water
dc.subjectEnvironmental costs
dc.subjectWater footprint
dc.subject.otherhttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.00.00
dc.titleAgricultural eco-efficiency and water footprint- A case study of fifteen crops in the Chupaca province of Peru
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Agricultural eco-efficiency and water footprint-A case study of fifteen crops in the Chupaca province of Peru.pdf
Tamaño:
850.09 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículo en Versión Publicada