Comparative Analysis of AHP and TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Mining Method Selection

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Gómez, Edgar
dc.contributor.authorCcatamayo Barrios, Johnny Henrry
dc.contributor.authorHuamán Romaní, Yersi Luis
dc.contributor.authorFlores Castillo, Marcos Marcelo
dc.contributor.authorCarrillo De la cruz, Linda Katherine
dc.contributor.authorDe la Cruz-Girón, Kevin Arnold
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-16T21:15:07Z
dc.date.available2026-04-16T21:15:07Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-27
dc.description.abstractIn the realm of mineral resource extraction, the adoption of decision-making methodologies for the selection of appropriate mining techniques has garnered considerable attention in recent decades. This study aims to provide a comparative assessment of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) as multi-criteria decision-making methods in the context of mining method selection. Case in point, the Gol Gohar Iron Mine No. 3, situated in Kerman province, was chosen for this investigation. In light of numerical scoring procedures, three primary extraction methods — Open Pit, Cut & Fill, and Sublevel Caving — were selected for initial consideration. Subsequently, these primary options were evaluated using decision-making models, taking into account management indicators. The goal was to determine the ranking and efficacy of these models in the selection of the extraction method. Our findings suggest that the AHP method, premised on paired comparisons, exhibits superior efficacy in mining method selection compared to the TOPSIS method. Furthermore, due to the interaction between indicators, the AHP method is recommended as the more suitable model relative to the TOPSIS method. Upon implementation of the model, the Open Pit mining method emerged as the most optimal extraction method for the anomaly No. 3 of Gol Gohar Iron Mine.
dc.identifier.citationCcatamayo-Barrios, J.H., Huamán-Romaní, Y.L., Seminario-Morales, M.V., Flores-Castillo, M.M., Gutiérrez-Gómez, E., Carrillo-De la cruz, L.K., de la Cruz-Girón, K.A. (2023). Comparative analysis of AHP and TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making methods for mining method selection. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 1665-1674. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.100516
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.100516
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14388/134
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInternational Information and Engineering Tecnology Association
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceVol. 10, No. 5, October, 2023, pp. 1665-1674
dc.subjectSelection
dc.subjectExtraction method
dc.subjectNumerical scoring
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision making
dc.subjectSeminario Morales, María Verónica
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.00.00
dc.titleComparative Analysis of AHP and TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Mining Method Selection
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Comparative Analysis of AHP and TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Mining Method.pdf
Tamaño:
1.15 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículo en Versión Publicada